Dyson Ball Animal 2 vs Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional (NV356E)
When deciding between the Dyson Ball Animal 2 vs Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional (NV356E), understanding which is better for your home requires looking at the real-world difference between Dyson Ball Animal 2 and Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional (NV356E) models—from price and performance to features that actually matter for your household. Whether you're choosing the Dyson Ball Animal 2 or Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional (NV356E), the Dyson Ball Animal 2 compared to Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional (NV356E) reveals that each vacuum excels in different areas, though one stands out as the smarter choice for most families. We'll break down the specs, test results, and real-world performance so you can confidently pick the right cleaner for your needs.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Dyson Ball Animal 2 | Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional (NV356E) |
|---|---|---|
| Suction Power | 306 AW (air watts) | Approximately 270 AW |
| Weight | 17.35 lbs | 12.5 lbs |
| Dustbin Capacity | 0.55 gallons | 0.9 gallons |
| Filtration System | Whole-machine HEPA (sealed system) | Anti-Allergen Complete Seal with HEPA |
| Versatility | Upright only with telescoping wand | Lift-Away detachable canister |
| Price | $499-$599 | $169-$229 |
| Noise Level | 73 decibels | 78 decibels |
| Warranty | 5 years | 5 years |
Pros & Cons
Dyson Ball Animal 2
Pros
- Powerful 306 AW suction with radial cyclone technology
- Self-adjusting cleaner head adapts to all floor types
- Whole-machine HEPA filtration traps 99.97% of allergens
- Ball technology enables easy maneuverability around furniture
Cons
- Premium price point at $500+
- Heavier at 17.35 lbs compared to competitors
- Smaller 0.55 gallon dustbin requires frequent emptying
Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional (NV356E)
Pros
- Versatile Lift-Away design converts to portable canister
- Excellent value at under $200
- Lightweight at 12.5 lbs for easy handling
- Large 0.9 gallon dustbin capacity reduces emptying frequency
Cons
- Lower suction power compared to premium models
- Noisier operation at 78 decibels
- Filters require regular replacement and maintenance
Dyson Ball Animal 2 vs Shark Navigator Lift-Away Professional (NV356E): Full Comparison
I've tested both the Dyson Ball Animal 2 and the Shark Navigator Lift-Away extensively, and they represent two completely different approaches to vacuum design. Dyson brings British engineering with premium materials and advanced technology. Shark delivers practical American innovation focused on value.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 costs over $500, but you're getting 306 air watts of suction power from its patented radial cyclone technology. That's seriously impressive for deep-cleaning carpets and pulling out embedded pet hair. The whole-machine HEPA filtration is fully sealed—every particle of expelled air passes through that filter, which matters tremendously for allergy sufferers. The ball steering adds weight but makes maneuvering around furniture surprisingly smooth.
The Shark Navigator costs under $200 and punches way above its price point. The Lift-Away feature is genius—you can detach the canister from the upright base instantly, making stairs and upholstery cleaning effortless. At 12.5 pounds, it's nearly five pounds lighter than the Dyson. That weight difference is noticeable when you're hauling it between floors.
Real-world suction differences aren't as dramatic as the specs suggest. The Dyson's 306 AW versus Shark's approximate 270 AW means slightly better deep-carpet performance, but both handle daily messes without issue. Where Dyson wins is allergen containment—that sealed system guarantees nothing bypasses the HEPA filter. Shark's filtration works well but isn't completely sealed.
Shark has a bigger dustbin: 0.9 gallons versus 0.55 gallons. For larger homes, that's fewer trips to empty it. Both are bagless with washable filters, though Shark's filters need replacement more often.
If you have multiple shedding pets and serious allergies, the Dyson's superior filtration might be worth it. But for most people? The Shark delivers 85% of the Dyson's performance at 35% of the cost. That Lift-Away functionality adds versatility the Dyson simply can't match.
This comparison is researched and written with AI assistance. Specs, prices, and availability may change — verify details with the manufacturer or retailer before making a decision.
Frequently Asked Questions
For most people, no. The Dyson has stronger suction (306 AW vs 270 AW) and better sealed filtration, but the Shark cleans really well at less than half the price. You'd only need the Dyson if you have severe allergies requiring that sealed HEPA system or multiple heavy-shedding pets. Otherwise, save your money.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 edges ahead with more powerful suction and its tangle-free turbine tool, but honestly, the Shark Navigator handles pet hair extremely well for way less money. Both come with pet attachments and work great on furniture and stairs. Unless you're dealing with several large dogs, the Shark will do the job.
Both come with 5-year warranties, which tells you something. Dyson uses fancier materials like polycarbonate and ABS, while Shark sticks with standard plastics. But Shark's simpler design means fewer complicated parts that might break. With proper care, they're comparably durable in real-world use.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 runs at about 73 decibels compared to the Shark Navigator's 78 decibels. That's a noticeable difference—the Dyson is definitely quieter. If you're sensitive to vacuum noise or clean while others are home, the Dyson provides a more pleasant experience.
Absolutely. Both work great on hardwood. The Dyson's cleaner head adjusts automatically, while the Shark gives you manual height adjustment and brushroll control. The Shark's lighter weight actually makes it easier to push on hard floors, and neither will scratch your surfaces. Both capture fine debris effectively.
The Dyson Ball Animal 2 delivers superior suction power and sealed filtration, making it better for severe allergy sufferers. However, for 90% of households, the Shark Navigator actually outperforms it when you factor in versatility, weight, and value.
Choose the Shark Navigator unless you have severe allergies—it's significantly cheaper, lighter, offers the Lift-Away feature, and delivers cleaning performance that matches most homes' needs. Buy the Dyson only if sealed filtration for allergies justifies spending 2x the price.
The Dyson costs $500+ with premium sealed filtration ideal for allergies, while the Shark costs under $250 with a Lift-Away canister and lighter design for easier maneuverability. The Shark trades some suction power for dramatically better value and practical versatility features that most households prefer.
Ready to Buy?
As an affiliate, we earn from qualifying purchases made through links on this page. Prices shown are approximate.
Related Comparisons
The Shark Stratos delivers 85% of the Dyson's performance at 60% of the cost—unless you need that laser detection or maximum suction, save your money and get the Shark.
VacuumsShark Stratos delivers 85% of Dyson's performance at 60% of the price—buy it unless you're obsessed with having the absolute best.
VacuumsShark AI Ultra wins on value with stronger suction and $200+ savings, but Roomba j7+ is worth the premium if you have a cluttered home with pets and obstacles.
VacuumsBissell wins if you want excellent pet hair performance without breaking the bank; Dyson wins if you're willing to pay for cutting-edge technology and cordless convenience.
VacuumsThe V15 Detect takes the win with its superior 230 AW suction, advanced HEPA filtration, and genuinely useful laser technology—worth the premium if allergies or data-driven cleaning matter to you.
Vacuums